Caymans

He hath founded it upon the seas
Wednesday, Jun 23, 2021

The posh London address 4,000 firms call home

The posh London address 4,000 firms call home

Aspiring entrepreneurs know that an impressive office address can be a powerful asset.
Customers assume that if a business can afford to be based in an affluent area, it must be successful. But a Money Mail investigation today shows why you should think twice before trusting a grand-sounding location.

Number 207 Regent Street is a smart Portland stone building in central London, with five floors based above a shoe shop.

You might assume the rent would be eye-watering. Yet floor three could be yours for just £24 a month — as long as you don’t mind sharing with 3,900 other companies.

That’s because 207 Regent Street is what’s known as a virtual office.

It means that none of the firms’ staff are based at the address, and any post is just forwarded on to their ‘real’ location.

They are paying to be able to use the address on business cards and websites.

As the firm that rents out the space, Hold Everything boasts on its website: ‘Having a virtual office on London’s Regent Street exudes the height of professionalism and ensures your business looks established and trustworthy’.

Companies purporting to be based at the address range from retailers to private investigators. U.S. businesswoman, Jennifer Arcuri, who claims to have had a four-year affair with Prime Minister Boris Johnson, uses the address for her firm, Hacker House Ltd.

But while most businesses have a justifiable reason for wanting a virtual office address, some unscrupulous owners are exploiting the system.

Fraud and cybercrime reports have rocketed during lockdown, with individuals’ losses totalling around £148.8 million just last month, says Action Fraud.

And City watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority, has issued about half a dozen warnings about unauthorised firms claiming to be registered at 207 Regent Street.

These include the now-dissolved Coombes and Kiwonski Investments and a loan firm, Sky Quid, which conned victims out of about £20,000 by convincing them to pay deposits for loans that never materialised.

It’s around 11am on a Thursday when we arrive at the Regent Street office. A postman is heaving two bags of mail towards the entrance and opens the door for us.

Far from glamorous, inside there are piles of boxes and parcels filling up much of the cramped space. There is also a small boardroom clients can reserve for meetings.

Hold Everything’s owner, Richard Cooper, 52, is taking phone calls in the office. Wearing jeans and a fleece, he is a little defensive at first and insists his business is not doing anything wrong. And he is right. It is perfectly legal to rent out a virtual office space.

The problem is unscrupulous firms often target addresses where a lot of companies are registered as it can be easier to go undetected.

Usually, these business owners don’t even bother paying Mr Cooper the monthly fee. They just list his company’s address on their websites without his knowledge.

In fact, when Money Mail presented Mr Cooper with a list of six firms the FCA has issued warnings about, he said he did not recognise any of them — although they claimed to be registered at his Regent Street address.

Coombes and Kiwonski was even listed at Companies House as being registered at No 207.

Yet Mr Cooper says he has no record of the firm ever being a client.

‘I feel disgusted when I think that fraudsters have used the address to dupe victims,’ he says.

Experts say it is far too easy for crooks to register misleading information at Companies House, which holds a list of all limited businesses in the UK.

This is because Companies House is not authorised to check the accuracy of documents submitted, and is required only to ensure they have been completed and signed.

Fraud campaigner Mark Taber says: ‘If a customer searches for the address on Google maps and sees a legitimate office and other genuine firms registered there, it seems more credible.

‘If Companies House had to check addresses it would close another loophole.’
Newsletter

Related Articles

Caymans
×